WLUSU Open Forum – Presidential Candidates

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

Kory -

Lawrence – I think it’s important that the president next year does have a good understanding of the system. The position that is being created is an internal operations VP to work with Scott and Jamie’s current positions. By allowing our existing VPs to work with the students in a better way and to let our students have the best possible university experience

Kyle – It’s important to try new initiatives while restructuring. We should be adding to the internal operations of the Brantford to help with the running of the campus.

**CLARIFICATION**

The new position that will be created till be the Services position, splitting the Student Affairs position into Services and Activities and leaving the internal operations position.

-  Lawrence specific: How would you like to further the relationships with SCS, etc. and how will this contribute to our students feeling better downtown

-  This for me is speaking with a lot of different students, security is a major concern. By working with Special Constables, Foot Patrol and the municipal government. We need to work municipally to increase the street lighting on the roads that students use frequently. By providing the opportunity to work with steering committees with groups that already exist to increase the safety. I know that the services you do have work well, it’s about continuing with these relationships and making sure that next year we have more tangible results.

-  Kory – Our real strength is going to have to be where we approach the city council and Brant region and asking for more police services to protect their citizens. When we look at the partnerships we can provide through the SU. When we look at the actual ways of increasing security, we’re talking about a larger goal, about a person who can advocate to city council and to the government. A lot comes from the community as a whole and it’s something that I’m going to be looking at for the EVP position

-  Kyle – Like the other candidates, I have campus safety in my platform. I talk about it with Foot Patrol extended hours and ERT implementation. Dr. Blouw is talking about the innovation of our campus. Foot Patrol expansion of hours could be an hour this year and another hour next year. ERT may not be a structured space on campus where they’re on call. It may be a service where a group of people willing to train those who are interested in providing first aid training on campus

-  Sunny – I am aware of this issue but did not put it in my platform because it is in the Ends Policy that the President has to ensure the safety of all students and to ensure that every student feels safe on our campus. I would delegate this task to the EVP: Brantford because they would be more aware of the situation. I would make sure that we’re consulting and putting the security for the students first.

-  What’s your worst quality

-  Lawrence – I am a perfectionist. I demand the best and expect the best of myself and of those who work with me. I have a strategic plan and I like to follow it. At the end of the day I see it not as my worst quality, but something to work with

-  Kyle – I’d say the worst quality I have is that I try to do too much by myself. I’m very involved on campus and am told “slow down” but that’s who I am. I like to get involved and make a difference.

-  Sunny – I’m annoying and I am unorthodox and because of this I’m going to turn it around and say because I’m annoying I can make things happen and being unorthodox does make enemies, but it is a different approach and a different way, but it may be the right choice

-  Kory – Mine is probably second guessing myself. I don’t like to make snap decisions under pressure. That can show part of a strong leader who looks to get more facts and the need to 2nd guess yourself. If you’re not 2nds guessing yourself how can you be sure you’re representing the needs appropriately.

-  If you couldn’t win the election, who would you select to be President and why?

-  Kyle – I would select Kory. I’ve had the pleasure of working with Kory this year and we have a lot of similarities in our platforms and he has a good understanding of student needs

-  Sunny – I would vote for Mr. Walker because I believe he is committed to make a difference just like me, by providing an opportunity

-  Kory – I would support Kyle walker, mainly because his platform is so similar to mine and also because there’s an agreement to work after the election, regardless of the results, because we both are committed to focusing on the issues

-  Lawrence – I would choose Mr. Preston for President. He stands for what we need to be looking at for students as a whole and has a lot of experience with advocacy

-  With less than 3 months to transition into the CEO of a multi-million dollar corporation, what experience do you have within the union to transfer over to this role

-  Sunny – Being on the Board for the last two years has changed me in terms of I have a goo understanding of what the presidents do, every other Friday for board meetings. Through monitoring reports, financial snapshots, etc. Other than hat, I have been in the office a lot, just visiting people, and I believe that I have a lot of information about how WLUSU operates

-  Kory – I don’t like talking about experiences. I think that they give you good qualities but sometimes frustrate me because it distracts from talking about the year ahead. Since Jan of 1st year I’ve been representing students in some capacity. From there I’ve taken on the ‘greater student picture’ and took on the role of OUSA campus coordinator and was involved with OUSA for the two years following that, which lead me into my current role of VP:UA, which has allowed me many great opportunities

-  Lawrence – For myself, I truly believe experience is something that is valuable. I believe it values any potential candidate to run an organization. This is an extremely well run organization, the students deserve to have us as a whole a representative who has worked from every possible position, almost. In those roles I learned so much and accomplished so much more. At the end of the day, you will have the choice of who will best represent you.

-  Kyle – I agree, experience does mean a lot. In terms of the candidates, we’re all very experienced, coming from different backgrounds across the campus. There’s a learning curve for anyone. I think Laura would admit that; she was a brilliant candidate who won by a lot of votes, but I think even she would admit that there’s a learning curve. I come from very difference aspects of campus life. I haven’t left residence since first year as a don for three years, I’ve had two part time jobs, on the Milton planning committee, and a coordinator-level position twice, and my university-wide experience is very useful.

In your platform, you propose extended holidays (thanksgiving). Does it affect the study period for exams?

-           Kyle — one of the different options, there is discussion about extending holidays and keeping the current study period. I’m not the kind of person to shy away from problems. I can see the extended period alleviating the stress from the study period

-           Kory — some think it’s great, others disagree. Feedback I’ve heard is 4 exams scheduled for the same day, and having 4 exam slots, having 4 – 5 exams in 2 -3 days is really stressful. Bigger issue is talking to the university?

-           Maclin — disagree. By moving these days around, students will have issues fitting everything in and doing well during this time. Doing the students better as a whole by leaving it the way it is

-           Sunny — not pres job to lobby to the university about this, its senate. I don’t use those two days to study, imp lazy when it comes to school. My friends are likely to by playing video games. But if I did have those days, maybe I would actually study. My academic standing speaks for me.

If you could only accomplish one this in your platform, what would it be?

-           Kory — biggest priority is preventing a strike, we pay too much as is. Represent stud voice before the discussions start. Implement strike prevention strategy to make sure students get worth

-           Maclin – sense of security, everyone deserves right to enjoy and use services that we provide safely, studs should have to worry about getting home after events and worry about safety. Work with SC, Brant city police

-           Kyle — low cost initiative. LORIS registration open, expansion of WLU wireless, lap top plug in, study group space

-           Sunny — strategic planning report is #1 thing I will be doing. Specifically Brant focused retail operation in Brantford outside of Williams.

What are you doing to engage apathetic students towards WLUSU and engage students who live off campus, and commute?

-           Maclin – working with LCD monitor screens on campus to give opportunity to know whets going on. Have all students know what is going on, thus eliminating all the problems that might exist, and get rid of paper. Programming right now is not working

-           Kyle –At this point in time, with the economic situation, we don’t need LCD monitors on our campus. What we need is low-cost initiatives to partner outside of the Students’ Union. Residence Life, SCS, WLUSP, LSPIRG and extending to other WLU groups and not just doing it all on our own

-           Sunny – I think LCDs are a good idea, but I think that the economics towards it are not a good idea for the time being. To answer your question. I don’t think that these students need to be part of WLUSU even though they all need fees. There are other silos around and we need to connect them all together. For any student who is not within the students’ union and their events, there are other areas where they can accomplish their student life ambitions.

-           Kory – I think it’s an interesting question that we grapple with right now as current VPs. Trying to inspire students to become involved with different projects is tough. There are a lot of things asking a lot of students’ time and it’s important to feel that they have the opportunity but not pressured. We need to look at our market research activity and see that we’re allocating funding to areas students have expressed interest in.

Q: Lawrence – I was reading through your platform and you say that our MPR is licensed and that our MPR is place to do food and bar operations. What are your plans and other candidates what are your opinions

-  Lawrence – It’s an important initiative for dining services. We don’t have a concrete plan. Financially it isn’t a possibility to run a bar. What I’m offering is to run pub style food out of a room that you already have with adding a few things. To be able to have students have this opportunity it’s a lower cost alternative

-  Kory – One of the biggest upsets was not including the DH in the plans for the new building, which I think is ridiculous. What I’ve heard from students is that on this campus there isn’t one place for all students to come together. I think this goes back on bringing in a GM, we need a plan and to know what we’re doing with Food Services on residence. It’s something that the university is obliged to provide to us, and we haven’t been successful thus far pushing for.

-  Sunny – I guess that for retail operations as a whole, because the campus was built downtown, it seems like they were hoping that the private sector would provide the retail services, and then focus later on the dining hall. Now that Brantford has existed for 10 years, it’s important to have a dining hall and retail operations. Most campuses newly built, have a dining hall within the first 5 years, so I guess it’s our time to commit

-  Kyle – I agree with Kory that it was not good to not see DH facilities. IN terms of space, I would like to see increase study space on campus. Going to my pub committee, we’re not looking at doing it overnight, but rather getting people together and examining the opportunities with our existing bar managers.

-  Funding for your various proposals, what will you cut form other student services?

-  Sunny – For the retail ops its easy because we already have a few that’s accumulated for a retail operations, but in my plan I have stated that in budgets, both campuses should be saving money in order to pay for capital projects. I believe that he WLUSU terms of financing, we should be able to meet Brantford needs immediately and not worrying about that

-  Kory – For the GM position, it would be balanced across the board. Very small, surface level cuts would be used. The flip side, the benefits of having a plan, especially when we look at business ops, they will act as a money maker. The output will be outweighed by the benefits

-  Lawrence – LCD Screens specifically. There’s a possibility for at a very low cost, for companies to put screens in at no cost but pay for software. It’s important to have a staff member in Brantford. It would be spread out over different departments so no one department is hit. The changes to the MPR would be limited expenses, depending on what people would like to see as a whole. Pride and tradition is important on this campus.

-  Kyle – If you were looking at my platform, it would be focused on the Pub. I don’t want to cut anything; I’m suggesting we look at the opportunity right now with no commitment to costs. I’m not promising a campus pub this year because I don’t want to cut anything

-  There have been questions about the campuses being separate. How will you bring the campuses together to be more tight-knit?

-  Kory – It will be a responsibility for the GM. If it means that we need to look into bus services between the campuses, so be it. The important thing we need is to develop the plan with the GM. It’s also important to highlight the autonomy. It’s important to develop the programs here so that you don’t feel the need to come to Waterloo as much.

-  Lawrence – I think the collaboration between the two campuses is very important. They’re not all the same. Yes, there is collaboration that can be done. PD&T this year shared resources and allowed us to share and collaborate on our experiences. Introducing the possibility of a manager for this campus, we need to have a plan. In this position, we need them to help work with us, to create job descriptions and work together to provide support.

-  Kyle – Every year people talk about transparency and collaboration. It’s the important to focus on the little initiatives. There are a lot of out dated brochures and documentation that say “Laurier” and “Laurier Brantford” we need to update this so it’s “Laurier Waterloo” “Laurier Brantford.” It’s also important to preserve the uniqueness of our campuses.

-  Sunny – It’s what your campus wants to do. Do you want more autonomy or more collaboration with Waterloo? In terms of collaboration, I’m willing to communicate with both campuses and I will be attempting to host a couple conferences on the weekends of every semester to try and communicate the things happening on both campuses.

-  Hiring a GM, what are the merits of hiring this position and what would be the day to day job description?

-  Kory – the feedback that I’ve received from our EVPs, AVPs, etc. is that we need help dealing with the finance side and we have an officer coming down a few times a week. We need to dissolve this and have Brantford operating on their own. They would operate a petty cash system, handling finances and above that it would supervise the Operations here at Brantford, specifically the business operations. This way we can ensure our GM in Waterloo can focus in the waterloo operations and separate the responsibilities out.

-  Lawrence – I have dealt with Mr. McMahon over the past years and speaking about this. The SAC has been a great resource, but is an employee of the University. Having a GM would work directly with students on a day-to-day basis is important. Administration fees would also be reduced, as we would rely less on our Waterloo campus.

-  Kyle – I like the idea of it, but I don’t know where you would cut and where you would get the salaries. The SU has identified some ways in which we can restructure the Brantford campus and I’d be willing to wait and see where this person comes first before we can make any additional staff support.

-  Sunny – I disagree with having a general manager as it’s extremely expensive to hire a management and Brantford has not been saving money to hire this GM. My approach is to hire a staff member to deal with Brantford’s student union matters. When they have spare time, they will be tasked with Waterloo-based tasks. This is part of my initiative to split the WLUSU into three branches with the GM managing all branches.

-  How do you feel about the relationship between WLU-WLUSP and who is your favourite superhero?

-  Lawrence – It’s an important relationship where we work together on a lot of different issues. I believe that we both work to meet the same needs. WLUSP work to inform students and WLUSU does the same thing, but on a day-to-day basis. I think it’s an incredible relationship but I think it’s something we can build upon. Batman.

-  Kyle – I think the relationship is getting better. I would say there are some gaps and barriers. We can do a lot better with communicating with each other, but I think a lot of people university-wide saw WLUSU and WLUSP working together to see how a service can be provided. Batman.

-  Sunny – I have nothing negative to say about student publications, but I have nothing positive to say about student publications. We should be working together as an excellent communication bond to reach out to all the students at WLU. I don’t idolize a lot of things, not even myself, so I can’t even tell you who my favourite superhero is.

-  Kory – I think the role of WLUSP is to hold the SU accountable and that’s what I appreciate them for. Using press releases with WLUSP has been a great way of promoting the great things that we’re doing outside of the university and has been appreciated. Steven Louis is my super hero – a retired politician who is doing a lot of work now in Africa and is someone who really inspires me.

-  When the BOD looked at Brantford’s budget, overhead was one of the biggest issues. How do you plan for paying for a full-time staff member when overhead is an issue?

-  Lawrence – Overhead exists because it works as year-long process that said if there are ways to minimize overhead we will use it. The position is a possibility that we can split across the departments. The different departments would share the expense, spread around so that students as a whole aren’t seeing the difference in the amount of money. This person would aid in creating the student experience that we all want.

-  Kory – I don’t think there’s anything wrong with overhead, as long as the output is useful. Overhead is a great thing if it means that you’re getting a dedicated resource as a full-time staff member. The salary is not based directly on the title. Overhead strengthens WLUSU.

-  Kyle – I’m all for waiting to see the restructuring and go through it. The last thing we need is restructuring on top of restructuring. We should see how the restructuring works out before we talk about creating a staff member

-  Sunny – a GM will be asking a significant amount of money. To elaborate on my plan, there are three arms. Retail, Brantford, and Waterloo; pull the VP:UA out of Waterloo and put it into “Central” with the CEO, VP:UA, and CEO to deal with the university wide affairs to make sure that everyone at WLU is represented at a university level.

-  With overhead at 60%, do you feel that initiatives like safety like buying medical kids for ERT (etc) should be more important than creating a GM position or creating an interim-dining hall?

-  Kory – Medical kits for ERT can be considered overhead because they can be considered a part of running the service. Overhead is a big thing. What isn’t overhead is what we put into purchasing things for clubs. When we look at what we can gain out of overhead is structure. We need those products, you’re right, but when it comes down to what is the student union: what is our goal. It’s to provide for the needs of students. I think it should do it through advocacy first and the best plans you’re going to get are people you’re going to pay. I think LWUSU should be doing more on behalf of all students and to do that we’re going to need professionals

-  Lawrence – To begin, I agree security and safety needs to be our number one concern and is a major concern. Going above and beyond that, no where do I discuss creating an interim dining hall, we should do it the right way. My suggestion for using a room and space that already exists is to offer students a way to enjoy each other. To bring in the facilities to bring in the food and drink, would not cost the students very much. For something like ERT, we need to make sure that we’re bringing them in the best, most responsible way for the campus.

-  Sunny – Money is always going to be the SU’s limiting factor. Our volunteers are endless and I praise the university for generating a near endless supply of volunteers. In Brantford, we only have a Williams and we’re not generating the revenue that we want. IN order to bring overhead down, we need to increase retail services to bring in more money. I will say that within my election, I want to pull overhead down to below 50% for both campuses. I know I can do that in Waterloo easily, but it’s more difficult in Brantford. I will make a note that in the way we do budgeting has a huge influence on the way that we do our Ends Policy, which doesn’t give us the creativity to put money where it really should go

-  Kyle – In terms of my platform, I take providing for the needs of students in a different way. My platform is full of different plans and initiatives to provide for students in a different way, with limited to no cost. ITS upgrades, improvements to Grant Fund applications, etc. I encourage everyone to go through my platform and try to put a price tag to it, because I think you’ll find that providing for the needs of students doesn’t have to be expensive.

Wrap-up

-  Sunny – I would like to thank all of you for coming and listening. I will provide you with a website (website) and I hope that you’ll provide me with the opportunity to make a difference and I’ll provide you back with the opportunities to make a difference. I’ll end it the same way I did last year with a rant. “I’m Sunny, I love honey, I don’t have that much money, I don’t like bunnies, and what else rhymes…oh well vote for me”

-  Kyle – I’m not going to force my platform or experience anymore. Strong Voice, Innovative Thinking and Collaborative Work (?). I encourage you to visit my facebook group. Some of the most interesting conversations that I’ve had in the past week has been with people that I haven’t met before calling me and chatting

-  Lawrence – I’ve said a lot of what I wanted to say, and I want to thank everyone for coming out. For me, a lot of what I stand for besides passion and experience is leading by example. I’ve had the opportunity to work with excellent people over the past few years and I’ve come to realize that students as a whole are working towards the same end goal in the best interests of all students. I’m promising things that can happen that you can see. The things I’m working with are things that you yourself have come to talk to me about. Like LCD monitors that don’t cost a lot of money and help you become engaged. The MPR is an idea that doesn’t cost a lot of money but can happen next year. Creating safety is crucial. The GM, limiting the fees that you pay, will help you on a daily basis. A lot of people are telling you what you need; Brantford knows what you need and what you want. I’d be very proud to work with Brantford next year. Believe the possibilities, my platform works with tangibles because it’s for you next year

-  Kory – Thanks again for coming out today and being as informed as possible. I’ve had some great memories of coming to Brantford campus, starting in my first year as a member of the Board and making frequent trips since. Brantford is always a party and for people I’ve bumped into, I’ve really appreciated our opportunities to have a chat. IM amazed by what the exec team can do. They literally take dollars and look at them as 100 pennies. It’s difficult as a VP at Waterloo to keep Brantford in mind. I will get a WWBD bracelet on my signing hand for “What would Brant do”? So I don’t accidentally forget about it. I’m pressing for autonomy or empowerment.

WLUSU Open Forum – Board of Directors

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

Board of Directors

Matthew Mendonca, Seth Warren, Christopher Oberle, John Sampson, Chris Walker, Robert Thompson, Tom Papanastasiou, Kyle Hocking, Jon Pryce, Ahmer Bhurgri, Michael Onabolu, Jonathan Collaton, Greg Evans

Seth – 1^st year Biz student at Waterloo. New to the area, from Nova Scotia who moved here in September for school. I’m new to everything around here, the people the ideas and the opportunities. I feel this means, to Brantford, that I’ll be open to ideas no matter where they come from – Waterloo or Brantford. I feel that representation of all students is what’s important. Ideas that may seem radical or unrealistic to a Waterloo student may be very needed for the growth of Brantford students.

Tom – 2^nd year business student. Voices and concerns of the student population are addressed. Clarity – when the BOD makes a proposal or change, detailed resources are available to you so you can tell why that change is occurring. I would consider myself a typical student. I’ve been a bit involved, but I haven’t quite found my fit. I feel I can approach the Board as an unbiased person. I want to make sure that the opinions and needs of students who do not vote are met, because their opinion is just as important as that of someone who is involved in WLUSU. I want to make it easier for students to raise concerns, other than email – such as a web format. I want to make sure all students get an equal say.

Jon – I’m involved on campus. I think the Board should stand for three things. Accountability, Transparency, and the ability to produce results is what the Board should strive for. Making that the board’s mandate would really help. As we’ve seen this past year, regardless of the boards progress or lack of progress there’s very little communication. I think there should be an allotted time where the Board is literally communicating to the student body and saying what they have done and what the results are. In conclusion, I think we should make Brantford back into the decision-making process. We need to make sure they’re accurately represented.

Greg – 4^th year PoliSCi major in Waterloo. Sitting director. I’m involved in many parts of Laurier, member of Sigma Chi, LMT, and others. I have a few initiatives for this year. They include realigning and refocusing the BCC and what they do. I was proud to be on the BCC realignment committee this year, and I’m interested in looking at reviewing the governance policy to see how we can work with the Board and Management Group. If you have any questions about my job this year or next year, feel free to ask questions or talk to me after.

Kyle – Sitting director and I have a few main initiatives. First, I want to reform our ends document (goals of the organization). One of the main priorities should be to lobby on behalf of students. Secondly, I’d like to continue my work on quality control, making sure that all businesses produce a quality product in a safe environment. I’d like to be involved in the market research project next year. I’d like to be with the results next year to work on what they suggest.

Chris – Sitting director – 3^rd year double major in PoliSci and history. 3 main things I want to work on this year with the BOD. I want to make sure the BOD is advocating on behalf of the students. I want to increase WLUSU services, for example Foot Patrol and ERT, creating programs based on what students want. Third, I want to increase the awareness of the BOD and WLUSU. With the Market Research project, we saw that WLUSU is like a bubble and you’re either in it or not. I want to pop the bubble.

Michael – Sitting director & board secretary – 2^nd year business. I ran last year on a huge platform of awareness, transparency, etc. I had a lot of big ideas that I thought were realistic, like bringing the BOD down to Brantford for meetings. I’m still that same person, but now I have experience. You can’t always do what you want to do, based on time limitations and other limitations. I’d like to do things more realistically. Working with the BCC and using them the way that they’re supposed to be, as the representatives of Brantford to the Board. We do tend to forget about Brantford students, which is natural because of the distance. I want to work closely with the BCC to make sure that we talk frequently and often. This year, I’m running purely based on experience. The strategic planning document is up this year and I want to work on that to make sure we know how we’re tying the campuses together and how we are working to serve students.

Questions:

-          Question for Greg – You spoke of the campus realignment plan, can you explain what that was and what that means.  Other candidates, how would you be involved, what do you think is crucial about it.

• Greg – The BCC realignment committee met and tweaked what the BCC’s role was within WLUSU. We’ll be exploring more next year. We saw problems this year in how council was not necessarily representing students in the way that is best used. We’re trying to find the best way to represent Brantford students and use the BCC
• Tom – I don’t have a lot of experience with the BCC. I do know that there’s not a lot of communication between BCC and BOD. Part of my platform is to bring this communication in, including tying in the BCC and BoD. We may need to look at something other than email, like social media to tie them together.
• Jon – I’m familiar with the realignment committee. We have one Brantford member on the Board this year, but most students are in the dark about the process on both campuses, so we need to look at that. In general, 1/15 BOD members doesn’t suffice for representation so there needs to be better communication between BCC and BOD
• Kyle – I’d like to continue on the structure of the BCC. Right now they look more like an advisory group. I’d like to give them more power, since no one can govern you better than yourselves. We should work on that to see how they can better represent students
• Chris – The BCC is very important and we did have this committee, but there is more work to be done, especially with communication. This year, there was a capital expenditure for the video conferencing project that the Board rejected because we felt that the costs were prohibitive. There is more work that needs to be done between the BCC and the Board and how we should work together versus where we step in for our role. It would make sense that we have a joint panel of BCC members, Brantford students at large, Waterloo students at large and management to hammer out what we want BCC to be in future years.
• Michael – The issue of the realignment committee, I didn’t sit on the committee, but I would like to be more involved with it. I’d like there to be more communication with BCC, but it doesn’t have to be formal. Using other methods besides email is important. We don’t have to use the chairs communicating directly through email, as it’s inefficient. We can coordinate when BoD and BCC meet so we can coordinate our meetings and make sure that we’re collaborating. I didn’t have the experience last year, but after going through it I would like to take this and surpass the limitations
• Seth – I feel BCC is hugely important. They are looked at as under the BoD, however I think they should have more control than that. We should be able to give them more control; I don’t have all the answers for that, but I will do everything I can to find the answers.

-          Apart from the BCC, your job is to represent both campuses. What are you going to do as a Board if elected, apart from the BCC, to represent Brantford’s interests?

• Jon – I think it’s important to hold various programs where we come down to Brantford. The communication factor needs to happen first, before we take the step of saying “let’s go down to Brantford and have meetings”. I think that’s the first step, then, if we have time, I’d be more than happy to sit on the committee for Brantford and come down to Brantford
• Greg – This year as a director I found that BCC and the BOD operate exclusively. There’s little communication between us, but there need to be connections made and conversation between us to find out what the issues in Brantford are. There’s a large connection between management, but as far as governance goes, BCC and the BOD had almost nothing to do with each other and that needs to change 100%.
• Kyle – I agree communication is a big problem, but I would say that I’m a big fan of holding one meeting in Brantford per semester. We had a chair this year who wasn’t receptive to the idea, but I think moving into next year that it’s something we could pursue. I think that communication is a big problem and we had this video conferencing system proposal to cost about $40,000. We wanted to be fiscally prudent and didn’t think that was an appropriate cost to take, but we need to work on it, because it’s not where it needs to be.
• Chris – I think that the challenge has been the Board isn’t representing the Brantford campus. The role of the BCC is to make sure that they represent us on the Brantford campus and anything is brought to the BODs attention. I think the realignment to give them more control would let them do more and give the Board more information. I think holding meetings in Brantford would be important, even though that hasn’t happened yet. Being on Senate, I see that they and the Board of Governors have meetings here, but we all need to be on board. There are hesitations to come to Brantford, for example, I see that some of the candidates aren’t here. Mass emails are also alternatives. Lots of people don’t like them, but they work for some things and increased presence in the sputnik would help.
• Mike – We’re touching on the same subject. To clarify on bringing BOD meetings down to Brantford. The reason I want to do meetings in Brantford wasn’t just to have said that we had done it, but rather to get Brantford students engaged. Just coming to Brantford isn’t enough, but the real reason you want to come here is to get student opinions and one of the main ways to do that is to get the BCC involved. Just sitting in a room isn’t going to connect us with the students, but coming down and getting involved, that’s how you get to know the students and get to know what they care about.
• Seth – I’m not extremely familiar with the situation, but I feel that the important thing is to get Brantford and Laurier students together. If we can bring the BOD and BCC together, it can trickle down to the rest of the students. It’s not just having a meeting here, we need to have events, social events, that the average student can get involved with in order to make it a cohesive Laurier community.
• Tom – It’s inefficient to come down here and have meetings. You’d have to have an extra question period just to get Brantford students to have their questions answered. I think it’s best to have our questions submitted through some kind of internet solution. I think we can do one meeting here per semester, but we would need some kind of event.

-          Is there a situation in your life where you stood your ground and didn’t change your opinion because of a larger group’s opinion?

• Greg – We had a heated discussion regarding the elections policy review at the BOD this year. Many of those proposals were rejected by the BOD and I was one of the main opponents to the initiatives. Many people wanted the changes made, but I didn’t think they were right for WLUSU at the time and didn’t think they were right for Elections. Many of them didn’t pass, some of them did. Even though I wasn’t successful with all of them, I was proud to stand for my opinions.
• Kyle – I like to think I stand my ground in every scenario. When I make decisions, I keep “Providing for the Needs of Students’ un my mind. If I can mention one specific instance, we were having trouble earlier in the year with service at some of our businesses. Several students had approached me unhappy with the services and products provided to them. In a board meeting I mentioned this to President Sheridan and we had a discussion that resulted in some new hires being incorporated into our Wilf’s pub and the Terrace Food Court. It was brought to me by several students and I stood my ground and made sure it was followed through on
• Chris – During the summer budgeting process, I was deadest against the video conferencing system because I didn’t think it was a good price point for us. Each time we voted, I would always vote no and I did not budge in my decisions
• Michael – When management first brought up video conferencing, this was when we had first started our term and had just finished our training and had just learned about how to take what Management was taking and assess it. Video conferencing was the first thing brought forward that I wasn’t sure if it was the best decision. I was also torn between standing out and opposing something that should have gone through. I stepped up and I did agree with Chris. I also stood up and stood behind the Market Research project, because despite the politics behind it, it was important to find out what the students want.
• Seth – In high school I was student council president. Many of the students came to me and said they needed more activities in our town of 1,300. There was a huge demand for a youth centre, but there was a push back from the older residents of the community. Many people thought it would be a haven for bad behavior, but rather was a haven for people to come together and interact and socialize. As a representative of the students, we took it to the town and pushed for it and pushed back against the folks that didn’t believe it would be a good idea and now we do have a youth centre and a committee trying to work on it and make it grow.
• Tom – I’ve been a soccer referee for almost 5 years. I referee pretty competitive games and I’m constantly being undermined by players because of my size and age. It is hard to try and maintain your decision and buckle under pressure, but I always stand by it. I’m on a team with two other referees and in this case, I will be with 14 other directors on the Board to help support the decisions
• Jon – I am also a referee and have similar experiences with high stress decisions. We all start somewhere and I think it’s important to realize that we all have our own beliefs. I’m an argumentative guy, I don’t like to be proven wrong, but if I see enough evidence I can accept. I was a councilor training director at a camp and I wanted to write the program as we went along, which was in opposition to my coworkers. I stood strong at this time for what I believe in and I think I will continue to do that as a BOD member

-          How would you feel about changing the BCC from an advisory group to a group that works on decision making with policy editing abilities to make them more of an equal to the BOD

• Kyle – I agree. I think it’s useful to the BOD to have the BCC in an advisory role. However, I don’t think it’s very responsible for me, as a waterloo student, to make decisions on your behalf. We need to restructure the BCC to make them better equipped to govern Brantford
• Chris – The BCC should be an independent group of the Board. However, in that instance, I would advise it and have the BOD as an overseer position. The Board should still have a 2/3s majority vote to overturn decisions made by the BCC, but for day to day decisions I believe the BCC should make the decisions on our behalf.
• Michael – BCC should be an advisory committee. That’s not because I don’t think that BCC shouldn’t speak for the needs, but simply because of the way our governance structure works. For now BCC is under the Board of Directors and the only reason I think that it makes sense now is that if you were autonomous, who would you be overseeing? I ask that because management falls under the Board and the EVP falls under the President. If the EVP were separate were directly under the BCC that would be different. Looking at it this way, should we be looking at separating Brantford out and looking at its own President?  We need to look at this form a resources perspective
• Seth – the BCC in my mind needs to grow in this direction. It needs to grow and become more autonomous at this point. At this point, it might not make sense to take this on, as they have no one to oversee. I think we can address this through restructuring. Over time I think it will happen and it’s going to happen
• Tom – I agree with Michael. We need to communicate with the BC and determine what decisions nee dot be made
• Jon – the BCC needs to play a bigger role, but they need to remain an advisory committee. Members running for the BCC also have the opportunity to run for the Board. However, if the BCC was independent, we would be polarizing and causing conflict. We need to be more on level ground. I think we just need to be better about how we work on policy
• Greg – People often confuse the BOD with running the Waterloo campus and the BCC of being in charge of Brantford and having the two organizations be exclusive.  Giving the BCC more decision-making power right now doesn’t make sense. We need to address how they work and how they represent the Board of Directors. Need to make BCC more effective within WLUSU and the Board of Directors. I’m not sure autonomy is the right word to use, but more decision making power isn’t the right decision in the short term, though long term certainly. Brantford is growing extremely fast, and we need to figure out how the BCC is best used.

-          There’s been some attention about the composition of the candidates running for BOD, including the fact that there are no females, no Brantford students and that not enough people ran. Do you have any comments about this?

• Chris – the BOD needs to be diverse. Women make up 80% of the Brantford campus and the majority in Waterloo, so there’s no question that there needs to be diversity. However, it’s not our fault as candidates that more women were not involved in the candidacy process
• Michael – Absolutely! I have talked to more people that will be running as women or Brantford students. I have asked a lot of other people and a lot of other directors because more perspectives are important
• Seth – We absolutely need more diversity, however as candidates it’s mostly the responsibility of the elections committee. Even in this room I see a lot of diversity that’s a good start, but there should be more
• Tom – I’d have to agree with Mike. Women do bring a diverse perspective to the Boardroom as we think on different levels.  I was considering putting this in my platform, but didn’t know what the response would be
• Jon – I think you’d have to be some kind of moron to not think that we need diversity, however I think they SU is doing a lot in terms of advertisement. In the BOD, all of us are running independent of each other, but I will say we need more women
• Greg – Not to play devils advocate, but its extremely important that we have diversity on the board but at the same time the fact that we’re all men, doesn’t mean that we can’t be effective. Gender doesn’t matter as much as you might think.
• Kyle – I don’t think diversity necessarily makes better decisions. We are a BOD so we can make better decisions on behalf of students. Yes I believe we need more diversity, but we also need to market ourselves better so that we can have more diversity in the future.

-          What has been your biggest contribution to the Laurier community, for those re-running could it be outside your BOD experience

• Michael – It has been getting involved and giving up my time. In 1^st year I was part of Habitat for Humanity, Xellerate, Foot Patrol, and this year been a secretary of the BOD. Being involved, staying involved and encouraging others to get involved as well
• Seth – I would say taking part and having others take part. I’m involved in house council to try and get my residence involved. It’s had a big impact on me and given me an opportunity to get to know a lot of people. Through clubs, committees and the Sigma Chi fraternity encouraging others to come out
• Tom – I’m trying to make my biggest contribution to Laurier right now. I’ve looked into clubs and tried applying as an executive, but you’re not looking at all of WLUSU, but looking at a small fraction. If elected this would be my biggest contribution
• Jon – My biggest contribution is Foot Patrol. Every single night, I’ll be walking different individual for four hours and meeting and talking to different people
• Greg – I’m proud to be part of the Laurier community. One of my biggest contributions is part of my fraternity. Sigma Chi is a philanthropic organization and I have had the honour of representing Laurier at conferences across North America and it has been a pleasure.
• Kyle – I do my best to get involved. I’m also a member of Sigma Chi and am active with the young liberals association at Laurier. I think it’s important not to over extend yourself and to focus on one area to do a better area there. One of my biggest contributions was to be a student and focusing on getting a good education
• Chris – Outside of the Board I’m involved in different clubs and am the VP of the Arts Student Advancement Program where we fund different trips, conferences, etc. I would also say my spot on senate has been a great way to contribute to the school, especially Brantford.

-          Do you have any comment as to why the rest of the candidates aren’t here to represent themselves

• Seth – I’m disappointed with the dedication of the other candidates. A lot of them left it to last minute, maybe they’re not taking seriously. Maybe they are and they had other commitments, but these are the people that came here today and I’m happy to be one of them
• Tom – We only have 13 candidates right now with more applying today. But we don’t know what the schedule is of the other candidates, so we can’t judge them. While maybe they want to take the time, but they can’t risk their student life.
• Jon – I think it’s important that all of us are here. I think that the people who aren’t don’t realize the importance of this event right now because gauging the importance of Brantford’s opinions is crucial.
• Greg – If other candidates had prior candidates had other commitments, they would have sent regrets. We’re the ones who are here, we’re the ones who care
• Kyle – I don’t want to speculate, but the reason I am here is because I truly believe that Brantford is part of the Laurier community and it’s too bad that there aren’t more directors here but that’s sometimes how it is
• Chris – I feel that if you’re running in an election, you should do election events. I’m missing classes today because I feel that Brantford is important. I know that form some other candidates that aren’t here, they didn’t know enough about Brantford to come and make a presentation to Brantford students. I feel it’s important to make it out to all the students at Laurier.
• Michael – My stance is the same as last year. I’m not here to bash any of the other directors. I would beseech that no one assume that they’re not here because they don’t care. It’s unfortunate when people draw conclusions about why you aren’t there. I’m here because I don’t mind missing class and don’t mind coming down to talk to students and answer questions.

-          Heard a lot about BCC and BOD connecting through emails – it wont work because of the way our campus is far away. What sacrifices will you make out of your day to have the two hours to be able to converse with the beef studs?

• John: willing to sacrifice time, whatever is needed to commit, the BOD will take up a lot of time
• Greg
  • Confused about question
  • Beef is hugely important. I have seen the communication struggles. Will make the commitment to come and see the issues
• Kyle
  • WLUSU is his top commitment
  • Going into next year, Brantford will stay in my mind as usual
  • Wouldn’t sacrifice missing class, enjoys the academic side
  • Anything else, he’s willing to sacrifice
• Chris
  • Willing to put the time in, shown through showing up today
  • Willing to miss class to have a more hands on approach in Brant
• Michael
  • Make time to do things he doesn’t plan on in the beginning
  • Will work around his schedule
• Seth
  • Always a busy person
  • Through campaign process, realize that BOD will take up a lot of time, huge commitment, the BOD will my primary focus
  • Beef is ½ of WLU, so we should focus on that
• ??
  • class first
  • Virtual comm. Not enough, will commit to listen to thoughts and opinions

-          Closing Statements

• Greg
  • Thanks for coming out. Said all I can say, clear on where he is on issues, will be around all day, vote Greg! Willing to speak after to students
• Kyle
  • Restructuringof organization
  • Continue with quality control
  • Market research results – working with the BOD next year
  • Loves to come to Brantford, been here few times
  • Pledge to be here more often
• Chris
  • reelection
  • more info to check out candidates pages
  • Your union! Important to vote
  • encourage friends not attending today to made the educated vote
• Michael
  • Care about speaking, to students,
  • Make the educated vote.
  • Don’t be swayed by words, but vote based on the action they can take
• Seth
  • Platform: accessibility, action, accountability
  • Accessibility key to Brantford, as it’s the one that is lacking
• Tom
  • came here not understanding Brantford problems and has left today with a better understanding of them
• John
  • We’re all here because we care, and reality of it we’re facing great student apathy
  • Personally, 90% of studs don’t know or care what’s going on, has taken as much effort to inform studs about the elections

-          WLUSP Referendum

• Liberal arts students are asked to think critically about the world around us, consider the options
• What would happen if we started saying yes to things? Accept and embrace things,
• Consider and vote yes
• WLUSP as a whole – 75cent per student per course (up to 4 course)
• Cant buy chips or pop
• Apathy of students – Stud pub fill in the gaps for this, WLUSP is asking the questions that students don’t have the time to do this, this increase will help them be accountable to us
• See the good, bad and ugly for student publications (misspelled words)
• Opened to all students of all disciplines – heart of a multi disciplinary
• Put in to practice what we say we believe in as a multi disciplinary school

-          Where is this need coming from?

• In the middle of a lot of new things, the money is going to go towards continuation to Sputnik, Carnegie, and Radio Laurier considering to coming to Brant
• Goes towards training to learn to serve students better

-          Any student can be involved in student pubs, student pub became a way for many to learn about campus and develop a sense of community within Brantford.

WLUSU Open Forum – Brantford Campus Council

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

Brantford Campus Council

-          Nick Savage, Cameron McGregor, Sue Matthews, Amanda Thomas, Courtney Skye

Dave Prang Moderates – 1 minute opening statements, 30 second closing statements

Nick Savage – Second year leadership student w/ business administration option. Member of LSA and involvement with recruitment and intramurals. We’re going into year 11 of Laurier Brantford and I promise to get the ball. Connection, Cohesion, Unity.

Connection – Small campus, you’ll know people just walking through campus. Want to promote that in Brantford and include the Waterloo campus and include Nipissing in this connection. Have a bigger Nipissing presence and have more activities like the WLU/NU soccer game.

Cohesion – Have more activities, communication and activities. Brantford had Stereos concert, but no one in Waterloo heard of it. As Brantford has buses to Waterloo for events, we should have them in return.

Community – to get the ball rolling on a more prominent Brantford campus.

Cameron McGregor – 2^nd year running for BCC. Had great experience last year, and still feel I can make the same positive influence on the Laurier campus and the community. Lots of Nipissing students on this campus, including myself. We need to keep doing the job we’re doing, but we need more communication.

Make the diverse community more at whole with itself. I have become a leading member with the Laurier Brantford Rainbow Alliance, to help fill the needs that have not been met. Next year I would like to see a committed space for a Diversity Centre like the system in Waterloo. We require the same thing in a publicly seen area, but private. I want you to elect someone who you feel you can talk to and listen too to trust to give your opinion to the BoD.

Sue Matthews – My motto is to risk, to care, to dream and to expect beyond. This is my second year running and I have come back with more passion than ever. I have been extensively involved. I am currently a book buddy for LSFL, VP for Diversity Club, Go Team Member, being a VP Liaison for BRC. All this leadership experience has made me into a stronger leader and made me optimistic. This has contributed to my knowledge of programming for the students. Progress is inevitable, but it is your responsibility to elect the right person to initiate the process. My platform is to be the voice of every student here and to be the friendly face around campus that you can see.

Amanda Thomas – My first step towards changing the world is running for BCC. 3^rd year journalism student, currently VP Recruitment for Journalist for Human Rights group. My platform is based on access, communication, visibility. Some students didn’t know what the BCC does, so I think I would like to promote the visibility on campus. I’m approachable, so students wouldn’t have a problem coming to me with their issues. There needs to be more communication between Brantford and Waterloo campuses. When I did some reading at their open forum, they said that they weren’t very sure what was happening at the Brantford campus. I also think that we should associate more with Nipissing and Mohawk College as I feel that we could all come together and bring a wealth of resources and a good network. Access to better services and to a safe campus are key. Visibility, Communication and Access are what I would bring to the table.

Courtney Skye – 3^rd year of Leadership. I am a transfer student, so I have been to college and this is my first year at Laurier. I’m part of the LSA, founder of Gender Equity club to empower male and female students, to challenge them and their beliefs. Secretary for NSA, member of Rotaract, and on Diversity Steering Committee. As a college student, I was a res assistance, residence council, criminal justice association, police foundations. I’m passionate about student leadership, I write adventuresinstudentleadership.blogspot.com. I love to get involved, but what I want to do is have communications. I want campuses to know what’s going on, I want to see us coming together. If there’s two clubs doing the same thing at this school, let’s get them together. This year I’m working with diversity groups to help arrange a film festival this week. I want to avoid waste overlap, improve communication, and I want to have events that focus on students from off campus. I want students from off campus to feel like they’re part of this community. I’m going to be that person that goes out and asks every student what they want out of this university.

Questions:

-          Any specific initiatives that you want to start communicating on between campuses?

• Cam – I mean not discussing every issue, because campus-specific issues are not relevant to the other. However when we feel there’s an issue going on here, we feel we should be able to access the resources of the Waterloo campus. It’s a lot easier to talk to a friend than a stranger. If that means visiting Waterloo more and having you come down to our event, that’s fine.
• Sue – I feel we’re not going to be communicating on every small detail, but for example the Diversity Club. I know Waterloo has a huge diversity initiative, and we can work together. For example sending emails back and forth, sending minutes from meetings, however our topics won’t always be correlated, but there will be major topics that affect each one of us.
• Amanda – I agree with the first two candidates in that we shouldn’t overlap. But perhaps, the WLUSU website there can be a common page about all Laurier students, rather than just specifically the two. Since you have a bigger campus, you will have bigger and maybe better events that we could have access to and have you down to our events. I also think maybe some kind of shuttle service between the campuses.
• Courtney – We need to be able to communicate with each other. We need to have communication to the campus. Potentially somewhere on campus to go and get information, or a website, or a TV that constantly changes and updates with new information. Reaching out to the students, instead of saying you can come to us.
• Nick – When I was in high school, we did a lot of activities that practiced debriefing. Laurier held its first Homecoming this year and we could hold a debrief with the Waterloo athletics council to talk about what went well, what could have gone better and determine what needs to be improved on. Communication about events, for example posters, communicating with Waterloo about upcoming events would be excellent.

-          What steps will you take to become more visible and once visible, what do you plan to do

• Sue – I would go into classes before they begin and introduce myself and ask everyone during the day, shake hands, make everyone know that you’re there for them. That your sole purpose is to represent the student body.
• Amanda – To be more visible, we need to have more events. Everyone goes to the local bars; potentially we could have events there or put up posters. Once we do get visible, we can communicate better with students and meet their needs
• Courtney – WLUSU is present in this school and it’s important to brand it. Shamelessly promote and advertise ourselves to make students know what’s going on. That’s how students get engaged and recognize how students get involved. Then reach out and see how to provide these opportunities for students
• Nick – I think WLUSU does a good job of getting our names out there. Every event that we have promotes WLUSU during O-Week, for example. The key for this is to reinforce it. Don’t stop at O-Week, have other events through the year to promote WLUSU. Communicate what WLUSU can do for every student.
• Cam – I feel going to a hawk team event is important. Hawk Team posted a survey asking about what types of events they wanted and running something that fit with the majority. I feel that being a BCC member, showing concrete results to the surveys that we run will be an excellent way just to further our names. Students don’t know about the process of getting things approved, we need to show them results.

-          Many of you spoke about joint programs. Could you concretely identify some ways that you’re going to  do or perhaps identify some ways you’re going to solidify these arrangements

• Amanda – I thought more about the students being together, like running hockey games, etc. In terms of contractual agreements, Laurier and Nipissing are connected through the coned program, though I’m not sure how Mohawk are connected. Though once we know more about them, we may be able to get them connected
• Courtney – I think WLUSU is bound to recognizing all of their students, and we have some students at this campus that go to a different educational institution. Bound to all students, address their needs
• Nick – nip has limited student representation, talking to nip North Bay – what can we do to make the university better?
  • Create a contract that represents the needs of the students better
• Cameron – nip news included in the WLU weekly news, which helps, but not. Concrete example is the Laurier/Nipissing Hockey game. It’s set up through LBA and SAC. They do a very good job of communicating with each other; however SAC is a limited council. If we were able to get more people out for that group, then maybe it would be easier to connect with these students. For example hey do events to raise money for different efforts that are similar to those of Project Empathy.
• Sue – Cameron talked about NU, but what about Mohawk? Do we have a way to work with them? We need to get our ideas together, go up to Mohawk College and see what they have and what their council does. NU is big and influential, but what about Mohawk. They have the same O-Week as us; perhaps we could connect that way.

-          Of connecting with the main campus, NU or Mohawk, which is most important to the growth of Brantford? How do you plan to balance

• Courtney – I think the most important relationship to develop is with the Brantford community. Students are also citizens of the Brantford community and as part of Rotaract I got out into the community to work with our local residents. Mohawk and NU can be fostered in the academic environment but I’m also concerned about how students spend their spare time when they’re not in class.
• Nick – I agree with Courtney. We need to connect with the Brantford community. That said, we are Laurier and we need to connect a lot more with the Waterloo campuses and I think the campuses should get ‘on-par’ so you’re not saying “main campus” vs. “Waterloo campus” . I think we need to connect with Waterloo, not just in student services but even in things like academic advising.
• Cam – I have a lot of friends that go to the Waterloo campus and sometimes when we talk, they ask why they should have to care about the Brantford campus and have their fees go there. We are the fastest growing campus and who is to say that in the future we won’t be the same size or bigger than Waterloo. We need to develop ways in which we could develop communication that will foster taking metropolitan courses together, etc. WE can do that through the means already mentioned. I think that is our most important gain.
• Sue – I don’t feel that any of the groups is more important than the other. I feel like Brantford has so much to offer and the city values our presence here. They cater to us and they’re very happy that they’re here. Going to the city of Brantford itself. See what they can do for us; see what they can do to increase our experience. What can we do with their facilities, use Brantford to our advantage. Brantford as a city is growing and is a great opportunity.
• Amanda – I think that Brantford is a really good community to be in. They have JCI to join which is a great resource for leadership students. I think we also need to connect with Waterloo since we are the same University. We need to be equals. It’s important to develop with NU because they’re here right now with us. I really wish we could connect with Waterloo more, because we should all feel like its one university instead of separate ones.

-          There’s a perception that students come to Laurier Brantford for first & second year, then move to a different school or transfer to different schools. Why does this occur at LB and how do you think that council can help? Is that an issue for WLUSU?

• Nick – A lot of students will transfer to Waterloo for courses. We have a limited course selection here. Even though they are great courses, there are a lot of courses like economics (etc) that we are lacking. I think that would be one of the main issues. As for issues such as moving to different schools or closer to the GTA, there are extenuating circumstances such as funds that can play into the decision. I think the courses are what we should address mainly as a council.
• Cam – I have met many students who have moved on to other universities or campuses. In my experience it is because they want to specifically dive into one issue and they feel they can do that better at a different campus. Offering different courses with more specific focuses will help. I feel that for WLUSU, this year’s gains in programming diversity will help, as I think some students have left because they did not feel as though their needs were being met.
• Sue – LB is a specialized campus. We have a ConEd program, Criminology, Journalism, etc. What about students who want to major in Business, Math, and Science. We don’t have enough courses for people to specialize in these feels. It’s also about campus life. Sometimes people don’t feel that they’re getting the full campus experience. As BCC we need to make sure that we’re catering to their positive university experience. It is because of our specialized campus and limited courses that people transfer. It’s a long-stage process to look into changing courses
• Amanda – I think business and music is a lot of what students want. I also wanted to do business and journalism, but I had to stick to journalism. Other students have moved campuses because of that. Off campus students have a different experience. In first year I was off campus and wanted to leave too. Off campus, only when you came to campus would you know what was going on and sometimes they were too far, etc to go to. Focusing on off-campus students would be a good way to start.
• Courtney – I think there’s a possibility for WLUSU to handle this. There are a lot of students that come here and don’t develop a passion for Laurier. It’s important that WLUSU help foster this and help people fall in love with being here. We need to focus on the students who are off campus and commute here. We need to create events and communication that will engage these people. Students here in CS should be able to access things that will help with employment and speak to their personal interests.

-          What is the biggest thing missing at Laurier Brantford, from a student experience standpoint and why? How can BCC contribute to addressing that one thing

• Cam – I have a very enjoyable time here, however knowing many first years, including a foot patrol walk, a student told me she wasn’t enjoying her time here. She felt there was no unifying sense and that she was isolated from upper years. Why would she talk to them/know them. The campus connection and spirit is at a disconnect. At hockey games, we see groups of friends cheering on the team, but they are there as friends, and friends of friends, but not as a whole. We need to listen to our students and establish a unifying experience.
• Sue – We don’t have a large population. That’s why they feel as though they are constricted to the same people, the same routines every day. I believe that there can be a lot of groups that form because of human nature, but what if there’s a large group of people. More groups to join, more people to connect with. That’s why people who feel out of place will have a difficult time forming relationships. People who are quiet, not as easy going and outgoing as all of us will find it more difficult to join. As successful BCC members, we need to cater to everyone and whatever they want will be given.
• Amanda – I feel that while everything is fine in Brantford, I think it would be a lot better if we had the option of a meal plan and better gym facilities, as that’s what I’ve heard many people want. If people go to other universities to visit friends and see the stuff they have, and then come back to Brantford – these are things we need to address. BCC may not have the authority, but it’s something we need to look into. WE also need to give everyone more of a community feel. Some people may not connect with others, so we need to cater to them as well
• Courtney – One of the biggest barriers is because we’re spread out over so many different buildings and there’s a perception that Brantford is sketchy and people are worried about their personal safety. WE need to address that and make sure that students are not at risk. They need to feel safe walking to classes, have access to foot patrol. I’m working now to increase female self defence training and male tactical de-escalation training. WLUSU’s priority needs to be talking to students and finding out what they consider wrong with campus. Find out what students want to change.
• Nick – Through the business classes that I’ve taken at Laurier, I’ve learned that businesses develop over time. We can’t expect to start this new campus and ten years later expect it to be just the same as every campus. Talking to other students, the basic things we came up with as issues were: a pub, a cafeteria, and a bigger gym. A gym is in the works, but the initiative needs to come from WLUSU for the other things. We can’t just expect a pub to open tomorrow, but we can plan. Look at feasible locations, design, timeline, etc.

-          As BCC is representation of students and BOD is execution of operations, how will you make sure you don’t cross the line of operations vs. representation?

• Sue – Basically, you need to know your restrictions, know who you’re allowed to work with and know your area. You can also work with the other counselors and see if you are crossing the lines or not and read the policies and stay within the lines. You are elected to work specifically within your zone. Read up on what you’re expected and not expected and rely on other counselors to make sure that you’re not stepping over the line
• Amanda – I think that it’s important not to cross over lines and step on toes. We should know what we can and cannot do, however if the needs of the students are things that would be management issues, we should give them to the management so that we could advise them about what to do. We don’t want to do their job, but we want to advise them of what the students need
• Courtney – I think the most important thing in the advisory role is to foster the environment that we’re on the same team. While we’re representing the Brantford campus, it’s important to work with those involved in the day-to-day operations to make sure that we hear their opinions and to work with them, but to make sure we don’t take over. It’s important to have a strong relationship with operations people as they’re on the front lines. It’s also important to share ideas, as we’re also students here and have needs that must be met.
• Nick – At the beginning of our term, have a meeting with people from Operations. Throw out the ideas; see what Operations says and what they think are reasonable for operations to execute versus BCC. Over the rest of the year, build the relationship and go back to operations and see if they see what the ideas are. Being able to start the relationship early and have the communication that says “here are our ideas, can we do them feasibly or is this more your jurisdiction”
• Cam – My understanding of the BCC is that we’re advisors of the Brantford campus to the Board who oversees the President who oversee the VPs. We’re not a 4-man army, we’re not to take events and run them. However, we can advise and guide the ideas for programming or advise the Board for them to take it under their wing to be passed down and along so that we’re following the same procedures. As far as events go, I don’t think we should tell them what events to run or undertake them ourselves, but we are here to advise.

Closing Statements

Courtney – When I decided to run for this position, I was hesitant as I’m involved in campus anyway. Ironically a John Mayer song came on and said “It’s hard to make a difference, when you’re standing at a distance” and I think that’s important. I would love for students to vote for me and let me make a difference. I feel I have strong ideas and am able to get involved in campus life. I want to let students know that I believe in them. These students are going to be the leaders of our society. They need to be empowered to have a great experience here so they can go out into the world to make a difference. I think students need to achieve the most that they can here so they have the best student experience possible.

Amanda – being a 3^rd year student, I have seen a bunch of developments in the Brantford campus like the opening of Williams, the St. Andrews building, the new residences. It’s a good improvement and I would like to be a part of making sure that these improvements continue and that the needs of the students are met. Even though we are developing, we shouldn’t forget the consequences, like pollution – we need to be environmentally friendly. There’s a Brantford group that works with 6-nations to prevent urban sprawl and prevent environmental destruction. We don’t want big buildings at the expense of polluting. I think it’s important to encourage professors to go online and let us submit papers online, to cut back on a lot of waste paper. During campaigning even if we could all recycle the posters and flyers. If you vote for me, I will try to promote a sustainable, safe and diverse campus.

Sue – We all have ideas, we all have goals, but what defines a true leader is putting those goals into action. Last year, I was the only female that ran for this position, but look at us now. My most realistic goal now is to get out there and see what the student body wants. Considering the population is 80% female, I consider that an advantage. We need to see what they want, what’s better for the students and be the friendliest face they can be. There are ideas, but we need to get the ball rolling. As we work collaboratively, that will be possible. My theme is risk more, care more, dream more and expect more than ever.

Cam – This year there are 3 female candidates. Last year, I thought it was important that there be a female presence on the council. I haven’t even been elected, and look my dreams have come true. I am a very trustworthy person and I have a backbone, so I will be able to stand up for what the Brantford campus needs. I am also very courteous, I will make sure I’m in the right place to do my job and compromise to help. My ideas on a diverse community are key.

Nick – As I said in my opening statement, my goal is to get the ball rolling. My goal is to maintain the idea and ideals of the Brantford campus but to also be the fastest growing campus in Ontario. To be as modern as the CS programs and Leadership programs and to just be incredible. Everyone looks at Laurier as a great university. That’s what Laurier is and that’s what Brantford is. I’m one of the most enthusiastic students at Laurier Brantford and I love this campus and everything about it. I know as a BCC member I will be able to use that passion and what I have learned to make it even better than it already is.

Open Forum!

Open Forum is tomorrow from 10 AM to 2 PM! It’s being held in the Lumberjack lounge (GRH basement). If you still question the various candidates running, then this is your chance to come out and question them over your concerns and the concerns of our campus! This is your opportunity to find out who deserves your vote!

Come out to make sure your voice is heard!

HAWK THE VOTE!

WLUSU Open Forum – Senate Representative

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

The WLUSU Elections Team will be posting a video of the Open Forum in the next few days that will give an exact account of candidate responses.

Amanda Flanagan – Acclaimed position

4:06pm – opening comments

- What committees would you be interested in participating on

• Amanda – So far, I find many of the subcommittees interesting. Especially I am interested in the new programs that could be offered in Laurier Brantford and the part that Senate plays. I would rather not like to get into more specifics, as I am still learning about the various subcommittees

- Which unique programs would you be advocating for on the Senate

• We have a number of unique programs, however I would like to work on expanding the Health Studies program. I know many students in that program that find it interesting and I would like to help them develop. As far as creating new programs, I have nothing off the top of my head, though I’d be interested in looking to expand on the many other existing programs

WLUSU Open Forum – Board of Governors

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

The WLUSU Elections Team will be posting a video of the Open Forum in the next few days that will give an exact account of candidate responses.

3:49pm – Begin Board of Governor Candidates Opening Remarks

Kory Jeffrey, Saad Aslam

- What subcommittees of the Board of Governors are you interested it?

• Kory – The infrastructure committee. Even in recessionary times, the Government will put money towards major infastructure projects, even while campuses are required to make large budget cuts. 
• Saad – I would also say I am interested in the infrastructure committee. The government soon will anounce that they’re investing $2B into university infrastructure projects and outstanding repair. 

- What would you do to best represent the interests of students during this period of growth. 

• Saad – The administration has said pretty much that the Waterloo campus will stay the same size while their resources will go to growing Brantford and Milton. I think it is important that while we expand we focus on quality. We must ensure that the education and student life is of a high quality
• Kory – I think as the Brantford campus expands, we have an asymetrical population chart. As it events out, the Board representation will even out. 

- If you could chair the BoG for one meeting, what Brantford specific items would you put on the agenda. 

• Kory – I would have to go with the cafeteria. It seems to be a pressing isue that has turned into a sink hole. It would be the hole in the ground before other expansion projects. 
• Saad – I would have to agree with the University Centre being important. It seems to be vital

- How many years of your term are you planning on serving and how will you liaise with the student government

• Saad – I plan on serving my full two-year term. I am running also for the BoD and hopefully am re-elected so that there is a natural representation both with the WLUSU and WLU to eliminate artificial liaising. 
• Kory – I’m not 100% sure if I would spend my 2nd year of the term, as I am attempting to get accepted to do graduate work. Of course I would liaise with the student government, however it is more important to do direct liaising with the students themselves. 
• Saad – The meetings are open and you are welcome to attend and students are encouraged to give input

- In the past the University has said that policies are not required for dealing with how students are handled during labour disputes. Do you think there is a need for policy?

• Kory – I feel there is a need for policy. We need to be prepared for these situations. If you were at York right now you would feel that there is a need. 
• Saad – I strongly believe that the University is here to put student needs first and policy is the best way to prepare for situations. Students have outside commitments and can’t be required to go to school during the summer due to work stoppage. 

4:05pm – Closing Comments

WLUSU Open Forum – Board of Directors

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

The WLUSU Elections Team will be posting a video of the Open Forum in the next few days that will give an exact account of candidate responses.

2:40pm – Board of Directors Candidates Opening Remarks

Jackie D, Freadie B, Emily H, Andrew F, Stephanie F, Sunny C, Jordan H, Justin G, Saad A, Greg E, Kyle H, Chris S, Kayla S, Michael N, Filippe G, Dilali Z

- Saad, Sunny, Jackie, Andrew: During the summer, the Board approved a Mama’s Pizza franchise be opened. Since then it has fizzled and nothing appears to have happened. What would you do differently

•  Saad – After we approved it, it was never brought to the Board as an issue and so I found out from another student. Doing it differently, I would support a better link between management and the Board
• Sunny – I was informed and asked Larry Wraith (Controller of WLUSU) and he said there was a financial issue. I am disappointed by that, but I am hopeful that it will get done. It is hard as a director at Waterloo to inform the students of Brantford. I don’t think it is easy for me to inform Brantford without seeing them before I can get something changed
• Andrew – It was unfortunate. I believe WLUSU was unable to get the financing to get the loan. I would say that it was handled poorly, as Brantford students weren’t informed. I would have made the motion more general, a place where brantford students can go to get food for eat in/take out and not restrict it to Mama’s Pizza. I would also prioritize projects in the order in which they should be completed. And to be frank Brantford deserves a big project. There should be updates to the Board so we could run marketing campaigns if they fell through
• Jackie – with this issue, it comes to accountability. I heard a few months ago that it wasn’t happening. There are a few steps that I would take if re-elected. Direct communication with people who brought this to the Board. This falls under the case of the operations, we don’t have control over funding. I found as a Board this year, we weren’t informed and thus couldn’t properly represent Brantford students. 
• Kayla – With the Board not knowing, it would be beneficial for someone from Brantford to be part of the Board to relay this information. 
• Stephanie – Shows the communication problems. I think my ideas with conference calls need to occur with BCC/BOD so that students in Brantford can be represented. 

- As a person who represents students at Laurier, what would you specifically and personally do to make sure that students have a voice at Laurier on either campus. Details please.

• Dialia – Accessible to students, to make it easy for students to inform me
• Philippe – Have an Open Forum that will allow students to voice directly problems to the Board.
• Michael – Union newsletter every month. Website where people can go to voice our opinion (agree with Kyle H). Open forums. 
• Kayla – Don’t have a specific idea, though just making myself accessible to Laurier Brantford. I wouldn’t be the best voice for Waterloo, but being accessible to anyone in Brantford would help. 
• Chris – Encourage students to come to Board meetings and have Board meetings in Brantford. Listen to Brantford students about autonomy and we could have permanent spots on the Board at Waterloo from Brantford. 
• Kyle – itsyourvoice.ca – Building a mockup. You can post videos, leave comments, access contact information, and access agendas/times for upcoming meetings in case you want to attend. You can also access information to see what has been decided by the Board in the past. 
• Greg – Website, students can sign up to have minutes from meetings emailed to them. They could access all BoD members contact information and make it easy to contact them. At least once a month the Bod should commute to Brantford and have meetings here and make it well known to Brantford students. If we have the new bussing system, Brantford students would be encouraged to attend Waterloo meetings
• Saad – Representing students happens all the time, not just in the Boardroom. Accessibility to students – Going to events and participating in different functions around the campus. Once elected as Director, you get a nametag. I try to wear mine as often as possible and it sparks conversation. 
• Justin – I like problems where the solution is simple and something I can do myself. I have friends that have gone to Brantford, I make several visits. I would try to come to Brantford at least once a month and try to drag other BoD members. If it means going to the bar and talking to students, I’m willing to make that sacrifice. Most problems are solved outside the boardroom by chatting with students. 
• Jordan – Website is a great idea. Let students know they can approach a director at any point they would like to talk to them about issues. If its with a directors badge, allowing them to come to meetings, talking to them at events, these are the times you hear what students have to say. 
• Sunny – BoD has a website www.wlusu.com/board or bod. We try to attach all the agendas onto it, however that has not been successful. We’re hoping to hire someone to update this. We have email addresses and so far no one has contacted me. We can set meeting times, I will meet with you and buy coffee for you. 
• Stephanie – Websites and the rest are great. The one that exists is great, however the information for it needs to be promoted more. Promotions of the existing website or future websites. Also getting out and talking to people and promoting better to both campuses
• Andrew – Student census. I want to have a census that goes out, delivered by email to every student email, as well as in person. Asking students what their values are so that the WLUSU values and vision can better reflect students. Also get the results from the Envision Laurier. I would allocate more resources and funding to the BCC to get them more training and to help them grow. 
• Emily – The best way to allow students to have a voice is by having a diverse group of students. By having people from different years, different campuses, it is the best way to cater to all students. Electronically it can work. If the BoD has a website right now and it’s not getting used, what else can we do. Something as simple as a box with suggestions – people can look at the box and submit their ideas/concerns or it may even remind them about forms available online
• Fraedi – Make ourselves available. Be the voice of the students. If you vote for us, it should be because you agree with us and agree with what we’re saying. By voting for us, you agree to let your voice be spoken through us so if we allow ourselves to be out with the students, we can get your opinions as well as show ours to the Board.
• Jackie – Ownership linkage is where the Board goes to the students, who are the owners. Besides having a monthly trip to Brantford and updating the website, as is already happening with the recent capital expense, I would just be around campus. Coming to events, to Rodeo, just talking to people. 

- Has the Board adequately represented the interests of Brantford students, if not can you point to a specific example and say how you feel Brantford could have been better represented? 

• Saad – No. One specific example is the Mama’s Pizza. I think a way to alleviate it is to set up a better linkage with BCC. As a sitting committee, BCC represents the BoD to Brantford, so I would push a better working relationship
• Greg – No. I have been around the Union and have heard little or nothing about Brantford. I think it’s absurd that members of the Board heard nothing about the failures of the Mama’s. It needs to be addressed, as Brantford is growing fast and in Waterloo we need to address that
• Kyle – No. Can’t think of a specific example. I have listened to two Board meetings and I don’t think I have ever heard an issue concerning Brantford come up. As a student, I don’t hear much about the Brantford campus, which is not in my best interests as they are an important part of the Laurier community and desrve to be adequately represented
• Chris – No. The majority of members, if not all, are usually from the Waterloo campus. If we had a policy of a minimum required number of Brantford students on the Board. I also have attended BoD meetings and have heard only concerns that affect Waterloo. 
• Kayla – No. Having a Brantford student on the Board would help with this. A specific example is with communication between the campuses, there is shortcomings with budgeting and between committees there’s very little communication. 
• Michael – No. One of my best friends goes to Brantford and he loves it here. I have talked to people in upper years at the Waterloo campus and many have never visited, they feel the campus is sketchy and don’t know what’s going on. There should be some more Board representation form Brantford and more promotion that we are all part of the same school
• Philippe – I feel Brantford and Waterloo were founded on the same ideals. We need to look at these same ideals and believe that you need to do everything you can to elect someone from Brantford to the Board. I think Mamas is an example of how the Board wasted its resources. 
• Dilali – I am not sure about Brantford’s issues, but I will say Yes. Seeing as the Council is a standing committeee, it seems as though the BoD has given Brantford a bit more autonomy and say in their own well being. I would also say No, as a regular student at the Waterloo campus, I have never really heard about what goes on at the Brantford campus. I think that with Brantford being a Laurier campus, we should probably have both the Sputnik and Cord on both campuses
• Jaquie – Yes and No. We have improved things from past years, like making the BCC a standing committee. Implementing honourariums. Making sure that the campus could be more efficient. No because of the Mama’s and the Dining Hall. We can strike committees to address these issues and have specific time at meetings to talk about Brantford. 
• Freadie – Not sure – Haven’t been to many Board meetings, only two. Brantford wasn’t discussed. As a student from Waterloo not knowing much about Brantford it makes me think that their issues are addressed. 
• Emily – No. As a Waterloo student, I don’t know much about Brantford. I would like to see Brantford play more of a role in the Waterloo and Laurier as an overall school
• Andrew – No. The first is Mama’s Pizza. Second, the Board wanted to move the Open Forum in Brantford and were going to tell the Elections team in Brantford move it, thankfully it didn’t happen. I think the solution is to make the BCC more powerful. 
• Stephanie – Yes, as BCC is a standing committee. No, moreso on the follow-through. 3 of the 4 existing directors here were unaware of what happened to Mama’s Pizza. I don’t agree to the extend of policy as to how many Brantford/Waterloo students should be on the BoD. Better discussion between the BoD and BCC could contribute to this, it’s all about communication. 
• Sunny – In the past two weeks we did talk about Brantford. As for the chair Asif, this question may be addressing your schematics, but I think you may be addressing that we haven’t been addressing the BCC minutes for a long time. I don’t remember the last time I got BCC minutes, hint hint. No, they haven’t been represented. But we do have BCC – it should be doing the representation job and relaying the minutes to us. However another problem we have is that BCC won’t listen on to the BoD meetings. If they were listening to the telephone link, we might be able to hit one of these and say that Brantford is not represented. 
• Jordan – I think it can be improved. Perhaps it hasn’t been represented to its full potential. We need to think, does this represent the students of Brantford
• Justin – I will say that No, the BoD hasn’t properly represented Brantford. I have never been to a Board Meeting in Brantford. Although scheduling conflicts would be difficult to overcome, I think it’s worth a try. I am a big fan of an open forum style board meeting. As a member of the peanut gallery, you have every right to ask questions. In an open-forum format, it’s easier for students to speak up. 

- Yes or no, do you approve a mandatory Board Meeting in Brantford

• All candidates say Yes, except for Saad who suggests students ask him later to explain. 

3:36pm – Board of Directors Closing Remarks

WLUSU Open Forum – Presidential Candidates

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

The WLUSU Elections Team will be posting a video of the Open Forum in the next few days that will give an exact account of candidate responses.

1:24pm – Presidential Opening Remarks
Chris Johnston, Laura Sheridan, Vadim Levin, John Champagne

 - If you had to vote for one of your competitors, who would it be and why? 

• Laura – I am definitely going to be voting for Sheridan, but if I couldn’t, I would be voting for Jon as he has a lot of experience which I feel is necessary. 
• Vadim – If I couldn’t vote for me, I would vote for Laura. I think we both have a lot in common in our platforms.
• Jon – I would also be voting for Laura, as she has a lot of experience that is very important. 
• Chris – I would be voting for Vadim. I’ve analyzed all of there platforms and I like his most. 

- For those who have experience in management, explain how that is important and for those who don’t tell us how your experiences are important. 

• Vadim – I have experience in WLUSU and elsewhere. I think what counts the most is the experience you have working with students. Learning how to listen, and work with them
• Jon – My experience has been mainly from a policy and Board of Directors point of view. I’ve been involved with all aspects, from HR to Finance to Student Activities, that overall experience and working with the Board of Governors where you get a holistic Laurier view, not just WLUSU. 
• Chris – Lots of experience working with students. Great opportunity as Foot member to  know and identify with students. I have worked with many Campus Clubs, planning O-Week events, such as a BBQ. I have worked with others in the community, I am a Big Brother. I love working with people. 
• Laura – I have a lot of experience in volunteer positions which have culminated into my VP position this year. Working with the Management Group this year, I work very closely with the other VPs to gain a very strong understanding of the day-to-day operations of the Students’ Union. I also understand the Policy Governance side. I have also developed a relationship with Brantford through working with my counterpart on this campus, Amanda Flanagan (AVP:Student Affairs). 

- How do you feel this year, the compliance with executive limitations and ends policies have been, specifically with respect to Brantford Operations. 

• Jon – I helped to create these ends and executive limitations, so what has been asked is how the President is doing his job. The executive limitations, are set to manage the president. I think the president has done well when it comes to Brantford and I feel that the ends policies set are for everyone and that Colin and his team have been striving to meet all of those ends policies
• Chris – I think this year the BoD has gone over and over these executive limitations and ends policies. I think Colin has been catching up, though there are lots of errors found. I don’t think it has effected Brantford in a positive light
• Laura – I am governed by these limitations and policies. I have been working my hardest to stay in line with these. Working with Brantford, we have been increasing Brantford autonomy and through monitoring reports they can increase their voice
• Vadim – As I said, this is only my second visit to Brantford, so I wouldn’t be able to say how Colin has done here. There is, however, a lot that needs to be done and to be improved. We need to look at how we can improve the student experience. 

Chris: We have had the Bus to Waterloo promised often in the past and it has yet to happen. What background have you done, what is the financial structure

• Chris – I have called Greyhound. It would be from the Waterloo city to Brantford city. It would be a fee to ride the bus. There would be incentives given to Greyhound in order to help them want to participate. 
• Laura – I have done some research and I am not comfortable putting it in my platform as I don’t believe it is feasible in the coming year. The route between the two cities goes through a higher level than just Greyhound or Coach Canada, so it is not a feasible solution. That said, in the future we would certainly be able to do something on a case-by-case basis that would bring Brantford students to specific events

- As President, what would your plan be to help Brantford students understand what is going on with the University Centre and how often you would connect with Brantford and come to Brantford. 

• Chris – There will be an increased fee proposed to help fund the hole in the ground. So it is up to the students of Brantford to determine if it goes forward or not. I will be looking to improve the speed of it. I will have a weekly call-in radio show and be here every few weeks
• Laura – The UC is in my platform. You deserve a dining hall, a meal plan. You are already paying for the DH, and I would be an advocate for it to be built as much as possible. I would be in complete communication with the EVP:BO and visit as necessary
• Vadim – I think we need to decide as students to decide our feelings about the issue. Leave things better than you have done – As president responsible for communicating to the students and to people who have worked on the project in the past. 
• Jon – I am well positioned to help students with the UC, as I have sat on the Board of Governors who make ultimate decisions on things like this project. The WLUSU has invested $1M in the project so it is certainly a high priority. I do have a good understanding of what is going on with the situation and that is to make sure that students get the best value for dollar when building this facility

- Do you believe that your monitoring reports to the Board should include a separate and distinct Brantford section. Why and Why Not? 

• Laura – Yes, Brantford should be doing their own monitoring reports. Brantford should be responsible for themselves and so they would be responsible for reporting to the Board just as the Waterloo executive
• Vadim – It’s a good idea to have that done in the next year, as Brantford obviously needs its own voice and is responsible enough to have its own autonomy. I think we need to work collaberatively to support one another and this is a more efficient way of doing it
• Jon – A monitoring report is a report that the President gives to the BoD to update them on work and ask if it is in line with their requirements. I believe that the question if Brantford should be split should be left to the Board of Directors, as it is their choice. 
• Chris – I would say that no, because we are one school with one student government. For one unit, one ends

- Jon: You have talked about both autonomy and a video conferencing system. DOn’t they conflict and what does video do that phone can’t do for less money. 

• I believe that through the transition of Brantford to autonomy there will be a great deal of support required so not having strong communications would be debilitating. The video system costs could be split with the university and being able to see the people that you are communicating with adds more to the communication. 

- On this campus it is easy to pass a non-tuition fee. What do you think of the non-tuition fees, the growth of this campus, and how easy it is for referendum questions to get passed on this campus (10%)

• Vadim – We are not in control of future voting, we are in control of what we can do right now. We need to leave this university a better place than when we came in. If we can, why not. 
• Jon – These fees are a signal that post-secondary education in Ontario is not funded enough. The way we go about approving these fees is mandated by provincial policy
• Chris – We as students seem to get a new fee every year and they suck, it would be nice to get free education, but that’s not what happens. When you talk about 237 people that could get a referendum approved. The way to compete against that is get more people to vote and or run a no campaign
• Laura – We have a very weak voter turnout at our campus. We need to be knowledgeable, break down the barriers, perceived or real, and make students feel more apart of what is going on.

- What issues do you see arising from the EVP: Brantford Ops receiveing less oversight than the rest of the VPs

• Jon – I think that when the EVP is hired, the fact that they are not as directly supervised is taken into consideration. I propose to seperate the two campuses, alleviating the requirement for Presidential oversight. 
• Chris – EVP:BO has a lot of latitude and is hard to manage from 45 minutes away. I am going to dedicate a lot of time to communicating by phone and by communicating. I dedicate myself to being here and to help the EVP:BO
• Laura – This would have been more relevant last year prior to the restructuring that has change the way that the executive was structured. I was part of the committee for restructuring and the VP is becoming an Executive Vice PResident and the AVPs are becoming Associate Vice Presidents. This better reflects the expectations of the people. 
• Vadim – There has been more and more responsibility given every year to Brantford students. I think it comes back to collaborating. If given the opportunity I would work closely with the Brantford Campus to make sure that they are well supported to help Brantford students. I don’t see it as that big of an issue if we can work together to help each other out. 

- The President is elected and the Board is elected. How do you see, if you were President, the dynamics between the BoD, the BCC and yourself

• Chris – I think the Board has addressed that this year. That they are the representation of Laurier and that the President is to be their spokesperson and to manage operations. I think that the BCC is to represent the President and the BoD to the students of Brantford
• Laura – I am against the President and the Bod to be competing against each other as we’re all working towards the same goals. I have worked directly with the Board and my track record shows that I am looking forward to a smooth year with the BoD. 
• Vadim – the BoD sets the ends polices and as President the responsibility falls to meeting these ends policies. They aren’t competing, there shouldn’t be a power struggle because w’re all representing students. 
• Jon – As someone who has been on the BoD for 3 years and been Chair, I would understand as Director what to expect from President. Including the BCC, as we get their perspective/thoughts/views. Any way you slice it, the way our organization is set up, the PResident is accountible to the Bod

- According to Executive Limitations, the WLUSU President shall not operate without a Sustainability Policy. Currently this is not happening because it was recently implemented by the BoD

• Laura – Sustainability is important and there is a referendum question to increase the Green Fee. I am an advocate of the day-to-day habitual changes to the lives of students. For example, trays in the Terrace would eliminate the need for bags when eating in the area. Changing the smaller-scale items can effect the large scale
• Vadim – The environmental sustainability is a global issue. Environmental Sustainability will be looked at whenever making decisions – for example are we being sustainable when we think of a new marketing campaign or event
• Jon – I am not an expert on environmental policy. I will create a sustainability office whose job would be to create policy and address environmental sustainability projects on campus
• Chris – I also would support the Sustainbility Office Referendum. That is where a lot of the policy will come from. I have many initiatives in my platform. From no trays in the terrace to different things going on with the turret. You can also read about the bursaries, with the whole campus coming together as students

- What do you consider to be the biggest issue on the Brantford campus and what would you do to change it

• Vadim – it seems as though there are several issues. We need to better connect the campuses. When there are events, do we bring Brantford students to waterloo or the other way around. Issues of Parking and working with the admin and the city
• Jon – I am not a Brantford student and won’t claim to know the ins and outs. I believe that the UC is a high priorety project as the SU has committed $1m and committed to operating a dining hall
• Chris – The biggest problem is the hole in the ground. There are a lot of things going on in the background. We will see after the referendum to see if the building will be built faster, if not we’ll need to find new ways and partners
• Laura – From my experience, a common frustration is the way that Waterloo looks at Brantford. That can be addressed a lot by the dynamics with the student executive. It’s a different campus, but we do have similarities. Once we find a balance, issues like the UC and Parking can be solved by sharing resources

- Chris: You propose WinterJam to connect the campuses. Would you be able to elaborate more on what it is and how it differs from Winter Carnival. Others, how will you connect or disconnect? 

• Chris – WinterJam is a one day event where intramural teams from this campus and waterloo will compete. I am hoping to create a battle-of-thebands here in Brantford to compete against our Battle of the Bands. It is like a campus cup event. There would be a huge concert. I see it as O-Week opening, Witner Carnival throughout, and WinterJam to close it off
• Laura – As VP:SA I know, once december hits we have a hard time running events because students have to focus on their exams. We tried polar jam before and it didn’t work out, so i think focusing on Winter Carnival would be more appropriate
• Vadim – How can we connect the campuses – putting on more events within other departments. If there is a varsity game, concert, etc. we could offer transportation and tickets. Look at it from all of Laurier and not just WLUSU operations
• Jon – I like collaberation, though I don’t know how feasible or environmentally friendly it is to continuously bus people to events. 

- question for Chris radio call in show, explain how it would benefit and if there could be a bias

• Chris – I think there are a lot of conversations that go on in the back rooms and it would be a way of giving people information right form the horses mouth

- Do you think it is possible to create autonomy in Brantford, how long will it take, and what is one concrete step to get there

• Jon – I believe by this time next year we could be electing a BoD and President for WLUSU. I forsee it being an evolution each year, with some responsibilities staying at the Waterloo campus. Working together with the EVP and Board, it is certainly possible
• Chris – I agree, but I think that the timeline is more about 2-3 years. Hearing from Dr.Blouw about the growth of students over the next few years, it should be sustainable. I don’t have a concrete step planned right now. 
• Laura – I agree, but not yet. We need to make sure when it does happen, Brantford is able to structurally and financially support itself, perhaps over 2-4 years. I would speak with both campuses and bring it to the Board of Directors. In the meantime, there are ways of providing independance through day-to-day operations. 
• Vadim – I think when it comes to autonomy it’s a touchy subject. Before we consider if its a good idea or not, we need to realise the way finances work and if they can be independant. Ways of doing that would be investing in business operations. Williams is a good start, the Dining Hall, looking at other options and helping that transition into autonomy, but it is still a few years away. 

- Jon: Is the timeline appropriate for WLUSU Br to be seperate this time next year and how will it affect relationships. Chris: Where will your radio show be after Radio Laurier is gone

• Jon – I perceive Brantford incorporated sperately is to have it be seperate initially as a subsidiary and to slowly transition it outward. It’s not feasible to cut completely but to start the process. 
• Chris – Radio Laurier should not cease to exist, it is supposed to transition to WLUSP. We are hoping it will be intact for next year. 

- Chris: how will you ensure that Campus Clubs are transitioned smoothly through the new rerstructuring

• Chris – Having contacts in Campus Clubs, an entire aspect of my platform is just about Campus Clubs. I will work with all the presidents. I will make sure that they are strongly regulated in the next year. 

- Have any of you researched what Brantford has already put in place for autonomy in terms of plans that the current student executive have designed

• Laura – It is not in my platform, so I have not. I have worked with the current executive to deal with independant projects, but not autonomy. 
• Vadim – I have not done research on the steps. My focus is to look for ways to improve the relationships between the two campuses and to improve on the way they are handled
• Jon – My research has involved my own experience and Mike McMahon (General Manager). As someone sitting on the Board, I have not heard of it, but we would be happy to hear about it
• Chris – I have not officially researched it, though Ih ave had casual conversations. I believe my timeline is in alignment with what the plan is. 

- With the EVP: Brantford Operations being hired rather than elected, how will you ensure that the voice of Brantford students are heard

• Vadim – It starts with the hiring of the EVP, but it doesn’t end there. Colin started Out-of-office hours in Waterloo. Extending this to Brantford would really help. Having more sit down talks on both campuses would be really helpful
• Jon – We’ve all just heard from the people running from Campus COuncil, all who indicated their interest in representing students. I look forward to hearing form them about their insights and ideas
• Chris – We have to work with people who are already in place. I don’t know who would be great in the EVP role. I am fluent in hiring processes, but not in Brantford people, but using the BCC as a method would be appropriate
• Laura – The President can bring a lot of experience and insight into how the internal operations of the EVP go, however there is a hiring panel, making it an objective and fair process. Brantford will function differently than Waterloo in the new structure. 

- What specific issues do you see coming up with the fact that the EVP is in a different city. 

• Vadim – I cant think of any issues at this present time, because i am not as familiar with the campus and what has happened in the past. I do plan on having the campuses helping one another out
• John- I can’t tell what will happen specifically, but Im sure any issue can come up with any VP. I plan on avoiding this issue by hiring the best candidate
• Chris – If you foresee specific issues, you shouldn’t hire that person. If you see something specifically, you should absorb it and address it. 
• Laura – The EVP has a similar job description to the WLUSU president, which I can see as an issue. However, the move to EVP from VP empowers that person. It is important to remember that the President is elected by Waterloo and Brantford students, making them the overall representative. With the switch to EVP and the way I foresee running my team, I don’t foresee it being a problem. 

2:32pm – Candidates Closing Remarks

WLUSU Open Forum – Campus Council

Please note that the comments and questions listed below are a result of typing as the individuals spoke and, as such, should be treated as a summary of the general response and NOT as a direct quote. Paraphrasing has been utilized in some situations and complete answers are not given. These responses should be treated as general guidelines to the response and do not reflect the full answer by the candidate.

The WLUSU Elections Team will be posting a video of the Open Forum in the next few days that will give an exact account of candidate responses.

12:15pm – Open Forum begins

Brantford Campus Council opens with 1 minute introductions. 
Trevor, Dan, Zach, Samira, Cam, Alex, Noel and Anthony.

12:23 – Question Period

- During introductions, we hear about candidates wanting to do what students want. What is the most creative plan for what each candidate wants to do for Brantford.

•  Dan – Pub nights to hear the voice of the students. More involvement from Council with student body. Council Activities – appetizer/meet & greets
• Zach – Video Conferencing system between two campuses. Environmentally sustainable, limit travel, bridge a connection campuses
• Samira – More campus clubs & organizations. Example of growing Brantford Residence Council for student involvement. 
• Cam – Campus paints. Tap into student creativity to paint some of the blank walls around the campus. Colourful campus.
• Alex – Promoting education in the community. Create student involvement to represent Laurier Brantford at the local high schools for recruitment. 
• Noel – More fun things. More students creates more involvement and more creative minds. Starting new fun events. 
• Anthony – Work mutually with Waterloo campus to feed off of each other’s ideas for events and programming
• Trevor – Expansion of Athletic complex. Wilkes is full and needs to be expanded to allow student activity. 

-In one word describe yourself and in one word, describe Brantford

• Zach – Leader; Innovative
• Samira – Passion; Improvement
• Cam – Fun; Special
• Alex – Objective; Community
• Noel – Energetic; Home
• Anthony – Epic; Family
• Trevor – Involved; Expanding
• Dan – Unique; Possibility

- Zach: As VP: Brantford Operations for two years, what is your biggest accomplishment and since you’ve been here why do you want to do another year and not give others a chance to have involvement you’ve already have

• Zach – My accomplishment is that people know who the VP is. In past years, in my opinion, people haven’t been able to identify the VP. I feel I have been open and transparent and have worked to know people on the Waterloo campus. I am running for BCC because I feel I have a lot to offer the campus. People with a good understanding should take on the role of representation. In current years first and second years have been running for council instead of committee positions and with my VP experience, I have  the ability to be a good representative

- This year, Council has been made a standing committee of the Board of Directors. In your opinion, what does this mean for the future of council and what policies if any require changing

• Zach – I feel this means more autonomy. Brantford wants to be autonomous, a separate entity, and this is a step towards that. From the Board and Council, there should be more meetings. I have yet to see a Board of Directors meeting on this campus. If that is put in place two times a semester, it may allow students who are unable to get up for BoD meetings to voice their opinions better. 
• Samira – Important to be well rounded. More ideas and creativity are included. Not sure about the policy at this time. 
• Cam – Means a greater respect for decisions made on Brantford Campus. Important because of greater communication. Policy changes could require that there be one female counselor required for campus council on a campus of 80% women
• Alex – Create more autonomy and more respect with more freedom to do what is required without worrying about beurocracy as much. Not too sure about policies, though if elected I will work to know them. 
• Noel – Puts an expiration date on the title of Campus Council, as if it is to end at some point. Gives us more power but leads us to autonomy, as we will eventually have a Board of Directors. Should have our own representation making our own decisions. Should be more BoD meetings in Brantford. As sitting member of BCC, should see BoD down here more often, as they still impact Brantford lives
• Anthony – As current member, we were excited to be a standing committee as it gave us limited freedom to make decisions for Laurier Brantford. Policy changes should be consulted with BoD to get input of everyone else. Would rather see input of everyone else to see what is best for Laurier Brantford. 
• Trevor – Offers more cohesion between the two groups. As far as policy goes, would like to see Brantford have more of a voice on what policies are made and what policies effect us. 
• Dan – Unifies campus and gives Brantford more of a voice. Policies could include not just having a female voice on the council but someone from every year to expand the voice. 

- Trevor & Cam: Trevor promises student athletic facility, Cam you promise a bar; Sputnik says we’re paying for a dining hall but not getting one. Are you intending for students to be charged fees and not see these facilities. 

• Trevor – First I have not promised an Athletic facility, I have committed to looking into the potential. I don’t see fees as part of my platform, as it is still preliminary work. It is important to focus on the Dining Hall
• Cam – I also never promised a campus bar (social facility), just to get the ball rolling. With more students coming in every year, we will want a place for students to gather. Possibly a referendum in the next election to get student opinions. We have current fees to pay and should look at policy changes that have to be made to make sure what happens with the dining hall doesn’t happen again. 
• Zach – I ran the campaign for the Dining Hall last year and it was on track until someone lost money. If you want projects to go anywhere on any University campus. We have tried going to the government, private investors, local people, but whenever we come to the students to ask for money it is because other resources have been tapped. I can answer more later on if you would like. 

- For all, but only answer if you feel you have an understanding: Why did you chose to run this year as opposed to last year or next year and what if any policies would you change next year to further improve elections? 

• Samira – It’s my first year, so I wanted to use my skills to help WLUSU and students. Policies, I don’t understand them at the moment so I won’t comment. 
• Cam – I didn’t run for campus council last year as I was applying to be a Don and with a ConEd student in 2nd year I decided to hold of. I have found, however, that I do have downtime and I have decided that this year could be my time to help.
• Alex – Last year I lived in residence and felt I didn’t know enough about living in Brantford or university life so I was trying to figure everything out. This year I’m in the Leadership program and feel that it is something I can do. As for policies, I would increase the promotions.
• Noel – Last year I was acclaimed. I came back because I want to make a difference on campus and if I don’t run, then what’s the point? I worked hard to help promote this with the rest of the council. I don’t think there’s a problem with policy, the candidates are a testament to teh hard work we’ve put in. 
• Anthony – I’d like to follow through with the steps we’ve taken. As for policies, we could increase the promotions for the positions open on campus
• Trevor – I haven’t run in the past as I didn’t feel I had an understanding in my first year. Now I have experience and I feel I can understand what I can provide. As for policies, I felt the policies were fairly good. I don’t agree that there should be a manditory female position on Council as there should be equal opportunity for all students to be on council.
• Dan – I felt I could better represent everyone this year. As far as policies are concerned, I feel the promotions could be better to get more people to come to things like the open forum. 
• Zach – I ran this year because last year I applied to the position of VP: Brantford Operations. I feel policies could include a manditory 6 week campaign before elections even begin so that there is a long time for students to become educated to run for the positions before they are required to submit materials, as I feel this year elections were rushed. 

- What does it mean for Brantford to be autonomous from Waterloo. Please be as specific as you can. 

• Cam – Autonomy as a campus means not having to ask our older brother for permission to do something. To not have to go to mom for money out of our purse. 
• Alex – Autonomy is being able to make your own decisions, spend the money you raise for yourself. If you have the means, then you should be allowed. 
• Noel – LB students making LB decisions.
• Anthony – LB students being self-sufficient, independant and self-sustaining
• Trevor – Equals. Being on the same playing field as Waterloo, Board of Directors, especially with respect to decisions that effect our campus
• Dan – Waterloo doesn’t ask us for permission to do things, they don’t understand the uniqueness of the campus. We should make our own decisions. 
• Zach – Respect for Laurier Brantford. First year I’ve seen BoD listen to the Council to show that our word means something to them. When it’s time for us to be autnoymous, it will be an easy transition. 
• Samira – Being proud of who we are, being part of a bigger, diverse community, with common ties with Waterloo. 

- Anthony & Noel: Having been on BCC this year, what have you acomplished this year that will merit voters to elect you to return

• Anthony – We have taken initiatives to environmental sustainability and enthusiasm with candidates. We have accomplished these small goals but are working towards bigger goals which is why we are returning
• Noel – Some surveys, this competitive election is a testament to what we have done. As a team council puts in an effort and we have put in more effort in the past couple of years. 
• Cam – Alot of the questions are focused to running against each other, we’re actually running with each other. With new ideas, with experience. When you’re looking at the ballot box, think that you’re running with each other to make a complete council to make a community here at Laurier Brantford. 

- Given that there is a large hole beside the Student Centre, what do you think about the lack of construction of the University Centre

• Alex – It’s not good. We’re paying for something that won’t even be here by the time I graduate (2nd yr student). It’s a necessary expansion but needed more thought and more planning. 
• Noel – Expecting to see in my fourth year if it was on time, but it is not. I’m paying for something I’m not going to see. I supported it before, I support it now because it builds laurier brantford, but I’m not too pleased
• Anthony – It sucks
• Trevor – The need is there for the facility. The recession hit, money went down everywhere. It is a learning experience for everyone, but I wouldn’t say it’s a bad thing, but we can learn from it and manage the problem. It is still a salvageable project
• Dan – Obviously a disapointment. If we ask the students for money it’s obviously a last resort. 
• Zach – I hate that I have to come to my office to see a hole. I worked very hard to create a vision for this cafeteria for the students only to find that I had to go back on a promise. If elected, I can’t guarantee you that first years will see a building. What I can guarantee you is that me with other counselors will be working on this
• Samira – It is unfortunate that we haven’t got a cafeteria. All unversities have their downfalls. We need to be patient, see where we can get financial help from, but it can still be done if we all sit together share ideas and be effective. 
• Cam – Bad, but we should do what our CT classes are telling us to do. We need to be making the change for our future generations. We pay and we dont get it but we’re making it better for future classes. I think it would be a really cool big pool, but I think we should wait until we get it. Some of us won’t be here, but for those who are, they will have a great time with it. 

1:07pm – Candidates have 30 second closing remarks.